This paper examines the complex landscape of the right to repair in India, a critical issue at the intersection of consumer rights, sustainability, and technological advancement. The right to repair movement finds its origins in the United States which was popularised by “hacktivists” in 2021. The foundational argument of the movement is that a buyer has a right to repair the things that they buy- that it is an expression of ownership. The paper aims to legitimise the movement by exploring its legitimacy in constitutional, competition and consumer law jurisprudence. The paper begins with an introduction to the movement, exploring its roots in consumer frustration over restricted repair options and the broader implications for consumer rights and sustainability. It then details corporate strategies such as restricting access to repair parts, planned obsolescence, and anticompetitive pricing that obstruct repair efforts and control consumer autonomy. In advancing its arguments, the paper frames the right to repair as a fundamental constitutional right within the Indian legal context. This section constitutes the core argument, invoking Articles 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Indian Constitution. Each article is analysed as it relates to repair rights, linking these rights to the broader concepts of consumer choice, anticompetitive practices, and environmental sustainability. The paper then explores the Transfer of Property Act, specifically Section 11, to further ground the right to repair in Indian statutory law, suggesting that conditions limiting repair could be repugnant to the rights of consumers. The conclusion advocates for the formal recognition of the right to repair as an inherent consumer right, proposing that its enforcement through constitutional and property law mechanisms would serve public interests in autonomy, competition, and environmental protection. This paper, by grounding the right to repair in a constitutional framework, supports its potential recognition as a fundamental right in India. In order to arrive at this conclusion the author has reviewed secondary material relating to right to repair extensively, along with existing literature on music copyright, constitutional law and competition law jurisprudence.