Siddharth Nigotia & Agnish Aditya comments on the case of A. Ayyasamy v. A. Paramasivam and attempts to clarify the law in this regard.
Leah Elizabeth Thomas in this paper claims that a suitable timeline for arbitration could prevent unnecessary delays in the proceedings and expedite the process.
Examining Violation of Adivasi Land Rights by the Mining Industry – A Case for Crossing the Fence from Anthropocentric to Ecocentric Paradigms
Rudresh Mandal & Sathvik Chandrasekhar demonstrate the brazen disdain
exhibited by the State and the mining lobby towards the violation of Adivasi Land Rights.
Anushka Mittal in this paper explains the importance of the whistle-blowers in India and suggests many measures to protect them from an economic analysis.
Vandita Khanna in this paper traces the evolution of laws relating to terrorism to
examine the contribution of the United States of America in moulding and effectively transforming international law through its extra-legal hegemonic interventions.
Subhro Prokas Mukherjee argues that the interpretation adopted by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Satya Pal Singh is palpably at variance with the text of the Code itself, which leads to further inconsistent implications.
Ramya Katti & Sankalp Srivastava writes a case comment on Sasan Power Ltd. v. NAAC India Pvt. Ltd. and emphasizes the convoluted issues that have
plagued the Indian arbitration policy for a long time.
Ayushi Priyadarshini & Madhurika Durge gives us some suggestions to improve the conditions of the undertrial prisoners in India.
Shivani Kabra gives us an interpretation of the Section 354 C in light
of foreign jurisdictions of Canada, Australia, United Kingdom and District
of Columbia Code.